Transformations in the Function of the Rubik's Cube

(Image credit: Ruwix.com)

August 25, 2022

Kymberlyn Calderon

12th Grade

Baldwin Senior High School



When the Rubik’s Cube was first released in the 1980s, it was seen as a toy that only the smartest people might figure out. Eventually, people realized that the need for patience surpassed the need for intelligence to solve it. Solving the puzzle once creates a euphoria for people to improve, and one of the easiest ways to improve is by buying a puzzle that turns better. Traditional Rubik’s Brand puzzles are often quite stiff and may require the solver’s entire wrist to turn a single side, but innovations throughout the decades have allowed people to turn the puzzle with up to fifteen turns per second. Though Rubik’s Cubes operate primarily on mechanics and mathematics, science also made this innovation possible. 

The mechanism of commercialized Rubik’s Brand puzzles is not the greatest, as it's the most basic design from the 1980s. This is because the Rubik’s company is a toy company, and thus prioritizes making puzzles that are less prone to accidentally falling apart as opposed to being more user-functional. Breaking out of the original design was thought to be risky. It introduced worries of the puzzle falling apart if used too roughly. In 2005 however, the interior geometrics of the puzzle ultimately transitioned from being very planar and square-like to implementing more conical and spherical features. The added curvatures in designs did hinder some stability, but modern speedcubes can cut corners if misaligned by over 45 degrees now. They can be turned quite roughly and quickly with hardly any locking up between turns. 

(Image credit: Amazon.com)

The traditional Rubik's Brand cube is held together by rivets instead of screws. The first major modification consisted of using screws and springs to make the puzzle fully adjustable. This resolved issues that the rivets created by allowing solvers to customize their tensions. Tension is the amount of depth the screw can have (causing tighter and looser feelings). Having springs also allow puzzles to cut corners from further angles, meaning that solvers do not have to rely on turning accuracy as much. Normal screws and springs were the standards until recently, as manufacturers started implementing spring compression systems and even magnetic levitation. Spring compression systems can be understood with Hooke's Law (F = kx). The law is a relationship between the stress put on a spring and the force you get back. The compression system allows solvers to customize the amount of force between the screw and spring, creating more variation in the puzzle's potential stability. This is quite important to the community because solvers have their own turning habits (force, accuracy, finger tricks), so they want a cube that fully suits their needs. 

Magnetic levitation (Maglev) is another innovation that companies are experimenting with more often but to a smaller extent. It consists of using two repelling magnets instead of a spring to create tension. The repelling magnets do not attract and thus imitate the resistance that springs would cause. The idea caught on because it would eliminate the direct contact screws and springs have inside the puzzle, which are a big source of friction that has to be lubricated. Maglev tensioning is not for everyone though, as some solvers prefer puzzles with control and fluidity over raw speed. Both however are certainly a step in the right direction to maximizing customization. 

(Image credit: First4Magnets.com)

(Image credit: TheCubicle)

In the earlier years of speedcubing, the pyraminx (a tetrahedron-shaped puzzle) used ball bearings to help with possible overturning. The bearings have a specific axial location on the pieces and make contact with each other, creating a clicky feeling. Although great in theory, the added click the ball bearings created was very strong and unpleasant. Ball bearings are often used for machinery, so rotations of the bearings create substantial radial force or click in cubing terms. To get the benefits of ball bearings without the snappy feeling, companies substituted the bearings with neodymium magnets. This idea was known as the Magnetic Positioning System (MPS). When that was a success for the pyraminx puzzle, that idea was implemented into all types of Rubik’s cubes, including the original 3x3.

Magnets may seem just as strong as ball bearings at first, but that is not the case. The magnets are never more than 5 millimeters in diameter, and often 1 or 2 millimeters in height. The maximum magnetic force of the neodymium magnet (N) is also considered, often going up to N40. As a result, the magnets only provide a minimal click when a complete turn is made. The click once again adds extra stability by creating a compliant alignment system. The force of the click can be modified using the Inverse Square Law. The intensity can also change depending on where the magnet is placed inside of a cube. If the magnet is closer to the core of the puzzle (which holds the 6 centers), the feeling will be more prominent and vice versa. Today, companies are experimenting with adjustable magnets. 

(Image credit: physicsforums.com)

(Image credit: TheCubicle)

The mechanics of a Rubik's cube can only enhance its function to this point given there's no lubrication involved. The typical lubricants are made of silicone. In the earlier years, it was typically silicone spray in a can, but over time silicone oils and differential oils used for race car trucks became the most popular options. The silicone oils are long-lasting and reduce friction made between screws and springs, two metals that make heavy contact. The plastic contact points are also lubricated to reduce friction and to avoid plastic dust building up inside the puzzle. Water-based lubricants are also an option and are used to add bursts of speed to puzzles, but they do have some problems.


The original water-based lubricants dried up incredibly fast. They would leave residue in the cube and would only work for a few dozen solves. Chris Tran, known as the “Rubik’s Cube Scientist” throughout the community, used his knowledge of chemistry to solve this issue. He created a lubricant called DNM-37 and used a concept called hygroscopicity as an inspiration. Hygroscopicity is when a substance is extremely attracted to water. Tran, who realized that the air has water droplets, made DNM-37 a lubricant that can absorb the moisture in the air; making it last longer. 


Overall, the innovations in Rubik’s cubes have been revolutionary to the speeds people achieve now. Magnets have been especially helpful for puzzles with more layers, and the numbers serve as a clear illustration. Some barriers that were thought unimaginable just a few years ago are currently being broken. The current 7x7 Rubik's Cube World Record (set in 2019) is 1 minute and 40 seconds, which was the 6x6 world record in 2013. 


Just like anything, a cube will never be perfect. People value some things more than others in a cube, so there's no one-size-fits-all puzzle out there. Although speedcubes are great now, new ideas will arise and remind us that there's always room for improvement.

The author of this article is an active participant in the speed-solving community. Visit her profile for further reference: https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/persons/2015CALD02

Reference Sources

Augustyn, Adam. “Hooke's Law.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 

https://www.britannica.com/science/Hookes-law.

Soares, Claire. “Ball Bearings.” Ball Bearings - an Overview | ScienceDirect Topics, 2015, 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/ball-bearings#:~:text=Ball%20bearings%20provide%20axial%20location,the%20other%20a%20roller%20bearing.

Tran, Chris. Cubicle Labs Magnetic Geometry Lesson #1, In Reference to MoYu GTS 2 M. YouTube, Humphrey Wittingtonsworth IV, 5 May 2017, 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7yU-iq3mWo&t=233s. Accessed 23 Aug. 2022.

Tran, Chris. DNM-37 Revision C: Cubicle Labs Chemistry Lesson #1: Hygroscopicity. YouTube, Humphrey Wittingtonsworth IV, 1 Dec. 2016, 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmeOIbMhOwo. Accessed Aug. 24, 2022.

Tran, Chris. True Modular Tensions Using Magnets Instead of Springs. YouTube, Humphrey Wittingtonsworth IV, 17 Oct. 2016, 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nh5zvUe83bE. Accessed 23 Aug. 2022.

Verdes, Panayotis. Cubic Logic Toy. 5 Sept. 2007.

Wang, Dylan. Here's Why EVERY Cube Needs the GTS3 Spring System. YouTube, JPERM, 8 Aug. 2018, 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1d9ZvoaqEw&feature=youtu.be. Accessed 23 Aug. 2022.