Neuromarketing: Controversies and Game-Changing Scientific Potential
(Image Credit: Intellectual Indies)
(Image Credit: Valtim Marketing Solutions)
(Image Credit: Cleverism)
September 13, 2023
Lucia Xiao
10th Grade
The Brearley School
Introduction
In the developing field of neuromarketing, researchers analyze consumer behavior and marketing strategies, enabling a more direct understanding of the correlations between physiological processes, consumer behavior, and decision-making. This essay outlines major scientific advances in the field of neuromarketing, particularly concentrating on its potential applications and contributions to our understanding of human behavior.
A Look at Neuromarketing
Neuromarketing, by drawing from psychology and neurological research, offers new perspectives on customer behavior, preferences, and marketing-related decisions while forgoing traditional methods such as surveys or experiments. The main goal of neuromarketing is to form an unbreakable connection between customers and products in order to evaluate the consumers’ cognitive and emotional responses to various marketing strategies [1].
Neuromarketing relies heavily on innovative scientific methods to establish these neural connections. One example lies in the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure deoxygenated hemoglobin, a protein that is one of the main, key components of neuronal activity. This method helps neuromarketers explain brain function with both exceptional spatial resolution (on the order of one millimeter) and temporal precision (second-by-second variations).
For instance, fMRI was recently utilized in order to capture the brain activity of teenagers as they listened to music by relatively undiscovered musicians. Neuromarketers found a favorable connection between brain activity during the first listening sessions and the overall sales of the same songs over the following three years. This study indicates that cerebral responses to music may be harnessed to predict future sales trends [2]. From a scientific perspective, it’s crucial to address several controversies toward neuromarketing, as they often stem from misinterpretation of scientific practices and methodologies [1].
Predicting Consumer Choices
One primary concern is that neuromarketing may render customers’ decisions entirely predictable. For instance, Electroencephalography (EEG) has revealed that, beyond self-reported preferences, brain activity might predict a consumer’s decision, especially for food products. On the one hand, this demonstrates that neuromarketing supplements the invaluable research and data that traditional marketing methodologies are unable to collect [4]. On the other hand, such data is often viewed as a concerning invasion of privacy.
It is crucial to note, however, that any studies that entail having consumers’ brains scanned or hormones provided only take place in the context of experimental research, and thus do not interfere with individual consumers’ right to privacy. Conclusions are too often formed from small experimental samples and then generalized to the public to reach false assumptions, as is the case in current marketing, biological, and behavioral research [1][5]. This generalization is where misinformation and controversy ensue about the risks affiliated with neuromarketing.
Influencing Consumer Choices
Another scientific concern is that eventually, neuromarketing will not only predict consumer choice but also influence it at a subconscious level, forcing consumers to make decisions when purchasing items that are no longer their own. There is evidence that customers’ decisions may be significantly influenced by marketing tactics, even when they are unaware of the effects or that they have been exposed to brand information [6].
A 2009 study manipulated the number of times customers saw images of bottled Dasani water. At the end of the experiment, consumers had the option to select one of four brands of bottled water, including Dasani. Customers were substantially more inclined to choose the Dasani water over the competing brands because of the repeated, unconscious exposure they had received to Dasani. However, it is imperative to note that this study does not prove that the consumers had no control over their actions or decision-making. If any of them had strongly disliked Dasani water or had a reason to pick another brand, nothing would have impeded them from doing so [8].
When consciously aware of the drive behind their actions, consumers may have more control, but this doesn’t mean that consumers lose all control over their decision-making when unaware of outside influences. There is currently no evidence that neuromarketing activates any immediate “buy button” that undermines consumers’ self-control and independent decision-making. Neuromarketing is not mind control; it is unable to lure customers towards an item any more so than traditional marketing practices [7]. It is also unfeasible to determine and target the optimal enticements for every unique individual. Therefore, while it remains true that marketing can influence customer decisions, operating below direct customer consciousness is not unique to neuromarketing and is rather a shared factor in marketing tactics [4].
Counterpoints: The Pros of Neuromarketing
The arguments made thus far were largely centered around the dangers and potentially unfavorable consequences associated with neuromarketing. Therefore, to balance the equation, it’s equally valuable to highlight the scientific benefits of neuromarketing so as not to misrepresent the significance of neuromarketing’s future. In fact, if responsibly used, neuromarketing can completely reinvent the consumer experience.
When responsibly employed, neuromarketing research can provide a better understanding of customer demands, enabling businesses to tailor their products to customer needs. This scientific knowledge in turn provides better, more appealing goods to the customer, as well as more alluring (and effective) advertisement materials for companies. Additionally, by targeting specific customer types with greater precision, businesses can utilize neuromarketing to reduce their overall volume of advertising, benefiting both consumers and companies alike [7][9].
Furthermore, the scientific insights gained from neuromarketing can be harnessed beyond the corporate world. Public safety efforts, such as service announcements and marketing campaigns, can be improved through the use of neuroscience approaches. For example, utilizing fMRI can help examine which brain regions are most active in reaction to signals transmitted socially. This research is invaluable for helping future campaigns convey their messages most effectively [10].
Neuromarketing represents a scientific frontier with tremendous potential to revolutionize our understanding of human behavior and marketing strategies. Though ethical concerns should not be dismissed, it is crucial to also understand the opportunity neuromarketing presents for major scientific advancements. To realize the pro-social advantages of neuromarketing, the aforementioned issues of methodological rigor and consumer protection must still be taken into consideration [1].
Reference Sources
[1] Plassmann, H., Venkatraman, V., Huettel, S. A., & Yoon, C. (2015). Consumer neuroscience: Applications, challenges, and possible solutions. Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 427.
[2] Berns, G. S., & Moore, S. E. (2012). A neural predictor of cultural popularity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 154 - 160.
[3] User, Guest. “Neuromarketing: What It Is and How to Use It to Your Advantage.” Sparks Research, 1 Aug. 2017, www.sparksresearch.com/blog/2016/9/17/neuromarketing.
[4] Venkatraman, V., Clithero, J. A., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Huettel, S. A. (2012). New scanner data for brand marketers: How neuroscience can help better understand the difference in brand preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 143.
[5] Murphy, E. R., Illes, J., & Reiner, P. B. (2008). Neuroethics of neuromarketing. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 7, 293 - 302
[6] WILSON, R. MARK, et al. “Neuromarketing and Consumer Free Will.” The Journal of Consumer Affairs, vol. 42, no. 3, 2008, pp 389–410. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23861362.
[7] Bartolucci, Valentina, and Malcolm Dando. “What Does Neuroethics Have to Say about the Problem of Dual Use?” On the Dual Uses of Science and Ethics: Principles, Practices, and Prospects, edited by Brian Rappert and Michael J. Selgelid, ANU Press, 2013, pp. 29–44. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hgz15.8.
[8] Ferraro, R., Bettman, J. R., & Chartrand, T. L. (2009). The power of strangers: The effect of incidental consumer brand encounters on brand choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 729 - 741.
[9] PLASSMANN, HILKE, et al. “Consumer Neuroscience: Applications, Challenges, and Possible Solutions.” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 52, no. 4, 2015, pp. 427–35. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43832372.
[10] Bartolucci, Valentina, and Malcolm Dando. “What Does Neuroethics Have to Say about the Problem of Dual Use?” On the Dual Uses of Science and Ethics: Principles, Practices, and Prospects, edited by Brian Rappert and Michael J. Selgelid, ANU Press, 2013, pp. 29–44. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hgz15.8.